tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 27 14:21:38 2012
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Dhammapada 183
On Apr 27, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Qov <[email protected]> wrote:
> At 23:26 '?????' 4/26/2012, De'vID jonpIn wrote:
>> De'vID:
>> >> bIyem 'e' yIjunchu'taHqu'[1],
>> >> batlh ghob yIpab 'ej batlh yIvang,
>> >> yablIj'e' yInItqu'moHlI';
>> >> 'e' ghojmoH {Buddha}[2] paQDI'norgh.
>
> I question {'e'} as the object of ghojmoH there.
My reaction is much stronger: {'e'} is clearly the wrong tool here.
How about {paQDI'norghvam ghojmoH Buddha}? Maybe use {maq} or {nob} instead of {ghojmoH}.
> In {SoHvaD tlhIngan Hol vIghojmoH} the lesson learned isn't really the object of the verb.
There's room for debate on the exact nuances of grammar at work, but what else but the object could it be?
-- ghunchu'wI
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol