tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 26 10:57:05 2012
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] voDleH Qun je
Maybe he didn't use ghubDaQ because he wanted to specify it was a boy?
> BTW how did they know it was a {puqloD} and not a {puqbe'},
> anyway, and what was his name?
Well, she probably didn't know the child's gender, but the authors would have.
No mention of the name.
________________________________________
From: Steven Boozer [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 19:51
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] voDleH Qun je
Voragh:
>> Curious that he didn't use {ghubDaQ} "first-born child" which
>> he introduced in HolQeD 9.3:8. I wonder if he forgot about it?
De'vId:
> Maybe one is not a {ghubDaQ} until one is actually born?
But one can be a {puqloD wa'DIch} in the womb? Maybe he needed something with four syllables for the meter.
BTW how did they know it was a {puqloD} and not a {puqbe'}, anyway, and what was his name?
--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol