tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 24 07:40:55 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)

Thorwald Peeters ([email protected])

• From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>
• Subject: KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
• Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:40:35 +0200 (CEST)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5

<citaat van="Steven Boozer">

>>Klingon word:   lay'
>>Part of Speech: verb
>>Definition:     promise

> Never used in canon.
>>Antonyms: lay'Ha'

> Used in canon:
>    not lay'Ha' tlhIngan
>    No Klingon ever breaks his word. TKW

Just a question of use:

with the above sentence, is the possesional suffix {-Daj} *never*
required, or just  required in some cases?

> --
> Voragh
> Ca'Non Master of the Klingons

-- 
Thorwald Peeters
a.k.a. qa'pIn qorghon puqloD, qI'meQ tuq
a.k.a. SoplaHtaHwI'
Khemorex KlinzhaivaD tuqmey ghItlhwI''a'

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
    • From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
  • Re: KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
• Previous by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
• Next by thread: RE: KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level