tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 24 09:15:22 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)

DloraH ([email protected])

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
• Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:14:49 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Thread-index: AcbHjDQYoWXUCZa2SJaqzKEOngUJlgADAemg

> >>Antonyms: lay'Ha'
> 
> > Used in canon:
> >    not lay'Ha' tlhIngan
> >    No Klingon ever breaks his word. TKW
> 
> Just a question of use:
> 
> with the above sentence, is the possesional suffix {-Daj} *never*
> required, or just  required in some cases?

In the above sentence there isn't any noun with which to place the
possessive suffix.


DloraH

• References:
  • KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
    • From: "Thorwald Peeters" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
• Previous by thread: KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: Klingon WOTD: lay' (verb)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level