tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Oct 06 08:15:08 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?
- From: "christoph.pichlmann" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?
- Date: 06 Oct 2004 17:15:01 +0200
=3Eapparently=22 is =7B-law'=7D: =7BjIleghlaHbe'law'=7D.
Indeed. But it lacks the ironic. =22-law' =22 expresses doubt. I have no
doubt that I am NOT blind.
I guess I should stop trying to be ironic in klingon until I get a
better(or any at all) grasp of the language.
=3E=3EI found the word in the KLL part of KCD, but where's the sentence
from?
=3E
=3E HurDaq tu'HomI'raHvetlh yIlan=21
=3E Get that piece of junk out of here=21 KCD
=3E
=3ENo idea, but I'm guessing from the game portion.
I doubt that, but I will check again. The spoken =22klingon=22 is cruel on
the CD(though in the language lab it s great - same actor).
=3E (I've never gotten KCD to work on my computer.)
It needs Win9X to run. It WON'T work on 2K or XP. Maybe on ME, though I
doubt it.
A computer with Win98 should run it fine, though.