tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Oct 06 07:20:28 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?

Steven Boozer ([email protected])

• From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?
• Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 09:20:12 -0500
• In-reply-to: <20041006_140953_C1_013b4c35_C2_000002e6_Name_00020663347@a grana.com>

christoph.pichlmann:

>jIleghlaHbe'bej...
>I am blind, apparently. (The "apparently" is meant to be ironic.)

"apparently" is {-law'}:  {jIleghlaHbe'law'}.

{-bej} is the opposite idea: "certainly, undoubtedly, definitely".

>I found the word in the KLL part of KCD, but where's the sentence from?

   HurDaq tu'HomI'raHvetlh yIlan!
   Get that piece of junk out of here! KCD

No idea, but I'm guessing from the game portion.  (I've never gotten KCD to 
work on my computer.)  {tu'HomI'raH} is also listed in the KGT glossary.




-- 
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons 

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?
• Next by Date: Re: Earthlings in Israel
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: tu'HomI'raH - canon source?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level