tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 26 12:32:13 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: nuqvo'

Eric Zay ([email protected])

• From: Eric Zay <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: nuqvo'
• Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:

It *may* be that we can add {nuqDaq} to the three TKD examples. In 
summary: AFAIK {nuqDaq} has never been used with any suffixes. Although I 
would never expect to see *{nuqDaqDaq} "whereat" (?), I wouldn't be at all 
surprised to see ?{nuqDaqvo'} "wherefrom, from where". The fact that we 
haven't seen this form so far may well be a coincidence or, as we used to 
say when I worked on a dictionary project for the ancient Levantine dialect 
of Ugarit, an "accident" of the canon. (I.e. a particular subject just 
isn't discussed in the surviving texts for whatever reason.)

Intuitively it seems like it should be correct.  Perhapse someone can bring this up to MO at the qep'a'.  I cannot be there.

SuSvaj

 



-- 
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons 






		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!

• References:
  • Re: nuqvo'
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: nuqvo'
• Next by Date: Re: Anyone know these people?
• Previous by thread: Re: nuqvo'
• Next by thread: Re: nuqvo'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level