tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jul 14 11:28:38 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)

Steven Boozer ([email protected])

• From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
• Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:28:25 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

qIno'rIq wrote:

>Once I made up the word {che'DechqaH}, just for "narrative reasons" (nothing
>that is either ready-written or anywhere published, yet; probably won't ever
>be <g>). Would anybody of you intentionally know what I mean by that (Yes, I
>perfectly know that it's non-canon. but just give it a try, maybe.)? Just in
>order to find that out, I do not mention my intention.

{che'}  "rule, reign, run, preside" (v.)
{Dech}  "surround" (v.)
{qaH}   "sir" (n.)

Haven't got a clue.  How about at least giving us the sentence it was used in?



-- 
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
    • From: "Raik Lorenz" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
    • From: "Raik Lorenz" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
• Previous by thread: RE: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
• Next by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level