tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 08 19:05:36 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: other person imperatives

David Trimboli ([email protected])

From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: other person imperatives
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:55:12 -0500
References: <4025F96A.15624.533CA0C@localhost> <[email protected]> <000801c3ee76$ad246120$6500a8c0@c1199768b> <[email protected]>

From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
> No, I'm serious.  ;)  Okay, sure, /Ha'/ is explicitly defined as an
> exclamation for "Let's go!".  So, let me use another example, say, "Let's
> play", would likely be /DaH maQuj/.  :P

The {DaH} isn't really necessary, either.  If a big child walked up to a
small child with a boardgame and snarled at the smaller one, {maQuj!}, the
small child would clearly get right to the playing.

SuStel
Stardate 4106.7

References:
- Re: other person imperatives
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: other person imperatives
  - From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
- Re: other person imperatives
  - From: "d'Armond Speers, Ph.D." <[email protected]>
- Re: other person imperatives
  - From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: nom ghel, nom jang
Next by Date: Re: other person imperatives
Prev by thread: Re: other person imperatives
Next by thread: Re: other person imperatives
Index(es):