tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 08 17:22:54 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: other person imperatives

...Paul ([email protected])

• From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: other person imperatives
• Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 13:57:15 -0800 (PST)
• In-Reply-To: <000801c3ee76$ad246120$6500a8c0@c1199768b>
• References: <4025F96A.15624.533CA0C@localhost><[email protected]><000801c3ee76$ad246120$6500a8c0@c1199768b>

On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, d'Armond Speers, Ph.D. wrote:
> ...Paul wrote:
> > I've got a feeling Klingons wouldn't bother with such sundry requests
> > for permission.  I'd translate something like "Let's go!" to just
> > /DaH mamej/ "We leave now."
>
> Ha'.

No, I'm serious.  ;)  Okay, sure, /Ha'/ is explicitly defined as an
exclamation for "Let's go!".  So, let me use another example, say, "Let's
play", would likely be /DaH maQuj/.  :P

...Paul

 **        Have a question that reality just can't answer?        **
  ** Visit Project Galactic Guide http://www.galactic-guide.com/ **
                         "taH pagh taHbe'"

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: other person imperatives
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: other person imperatives
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: other person imperatives
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
  • Re: other person imperatives
    • From: "d'Armond Speers, Ph.D." <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: nom ghel, nom jang
• Next by Date: Re: other person imperatives
• Prev by thread: Re: other person imperatives
• Next by thread: Re: other person imperatives
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level