tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 02 19:56:05 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: 'e' / about

Dar'Qang ([email protected])

• From: Dar'Qang <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: 'e' / about
• Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 22:16:32 -0600
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

At 08:45 AM 4/2/2004, SuStel wrote:

>QeS lagh has already answered this, but I think he missed the point of
>Dar'Qang's question.  Dar'Qang is not asking about the legality of putting a
>Type 5 suffix on the first noun of a noun-noun construction, he's asking
>what rule allows /tlhIngan Hol'e'/ to hover out there before the object.

bIlughchu'.

>TKD p. 60: "Any noun in the sentence indicating something other than subject
>or object comes first, before the object noun.  Such nouns usually end in a
>Type 5 noun suffix . . . ."
[....]

maj.  majQa! Hoch ray' DaqIp!

Thanks for the excellent, and thorough explanation.


Dar'Qang
bItaghbe'chugh bIrInbe'ba' 

• References:
  • 'e' / about
    • From: Dar'Qang <[email protected]>
  • Re: 'e' / about
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 'e' / about
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC re: your questions
• Previous by thread: Re: 'e' / about
• Next by thread: Re: 'e' / about
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level