tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 15 00:34:00 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: sentences 3/13/03 (was KLBC)




chepqu' ne' wrote:
>> >ghol'e' lo'laH vIHoy'.
>> >My compliments to a worthy opponent.

Quvar wrote:
>>The emphasizing {-'e'} is not necessary, but not wrong either.
>>The question for me is, if a "worthy opponent", is the same as {lo'laH}, 
>>but I think that's okay.

I do like this translation. My Merriam-Webster dictionary lists "honorable" 
as a definition of "worthy", so the verb {quv} could work here too.

If chepqu' does choose to use {-'e'} to emphasize {ghol}, watch out: 
there's a somewhat obscure grammar rule for verbs acting as adjectives. 
Take a look at TKD section 4.4, page 50. The type-5 noun suffix moves from 
the noun, to the end of an adjectival verb, so you'd have:

{ghol lo'laH'e' vIHoy'}

- taD



Back to archive top level