tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Dec 19 13:41:01 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: "Star Trek: The Experience" communique (STX)

Tad Stauffer ([email protected])

• From: Tad Stauffer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: "Star Trek: The Experience" communique (STX)
• Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:46:15 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <D062OL4284Y1B9QKC7C9TQJGRPZUA6.3fe31e30@quvar><[email protected]>

Voragh wrote:
>>AFAIK, we've never seen Okrand's correct[ed] version, nor do we know 
>>exactly what "errors" he caught.]

>Quvar:
>>okay. But what you show above looks at least grammatically correct to me, 
>>so perhaps the "errors" he talks about were only changes, or improvements 
>>- who knows..

Voragh:
>Agreed.  The text is virtually perfect, but for those who want to dissect 
>it, here's the complete text:
...
>   laS veghaS HIltonDaq <<Hov leng: yIjeSchu'>> qaSchoHmo', bIlopqu'meH 
> HIlton yIghoS.
>
>   Come celebrate the grand opening of "Star Trek: The Experience" at the 
> Las Vegas Hilton.

The only possible error that I see in the translation is with the above 
sentence - since <<Hov leng: yIjeSchu'>> is the subject of {qaSchoHmo'}, I 
would have expected the word order to be:
laS veghaS HIltonDaq qaSchoHmo' <<Hov leng: yIjeSchu'>>...

- taD

• References:
  • Re: {Hov leng} canon?
    • From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>
  • {Hov leng} canon?
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • "Star Trek: The Experience" communique (STX)
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: jaw (v)
• Next by Date: Tao Te Ching Chp. 4
• Prev by thread: "Star Trek: The Experience" communique (STX)
• Next by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: taH (v)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level