tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri May 08 20:53:24 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: tlhIngan maH (was KLBC)

• From: TPO <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: tlhIngan maH (was KLBC)
• Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 23:53:49 -0400

>...My complaint is that charghwI' has changed the meaning considerably
>more than my precis teacher would ever have let me get away with.
>
>...I recommend you read it once, put it down, and then re-express the same
>ideas in Klingon without further reference to the English text.
>
>Qov 

It was the english that threw me off.  I was looking for a "translation",
instead of reading it the way I should have.

DloraH

• Prev by Date: KLBC: Re: mach 'ach Hach
• Next by Date: Re: *reiki* lo' be'nal
• Prev by thread: Re: tlhIngan maH (was KLBC)
• Next by thread: RE: mermeH lopno'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level