tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Feb 07 17:27:21 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: veqlargh paq
- From: Qov <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: veqlargh paq
- Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 17:26:12 -0800
At 15:47 98-02-07 -0800, SuStel wrote:
}-----Original Message-----
}From: Qov <[email protected]>
}To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
}Date: Saturday, February 07, 1998 12:48 AM
}Subject: Re: KLBC: veqlargh paq
}
}>} che'taHghachlIj meqmey vItlhob
}>} I request the reasons of your rules
}>
}>We haven't to my knowledge seen {tlhob} take as an object the thing
}>requested. It might not be right. Some people will react more strongly to
}>your usage than I just did.
}
}We have, and it is. KGT p.184:
}
}juDev 'ej Dujvam ra'wI' DagheS 'e' vItlhob.
maj. jIbel.
Qov [email protected]
Beginners' Grammarian