tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Oct 26 00:45:45 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: short note re:KLBC
- From: Qov <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: short note re:KLBC
- Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 00:45:10 -0700
At 21:22 25/10/96 -0700, you wrote:
}><snip>
}>
}>>2)When a beginner posts (WHETHER USING KLBC OR NOT) **ONLY** the beginners
}>>grammarian (or acting BG, as is occasionally the case) may
}>>respond regarding grammar or style.
}>
}>Just to request clarification... I had understood that it was required
}>to let the BG respond *FIRST*, but that others could join with
}>discussion and comment from that point on. Was that a misunderstanding
}>on my part?
}
}Where did you get this from? I am new to this list, but the FAQ set to me
}when I subscribed didn't contain anything about this . . .
chovnatlhvam tIqel:
------New subscriber message excerpt-----HevwI' chu'vaD jabbI'ID 'ay'
[email protected] SUBSCRIBE TLHINGAN-HOL ROBYN STEWART
Mon, 1 April 1996 14:51:37
If you are not one of the official grammarians, please do not post messages
of the form: "Your grammar for this sentence was wrong. It should have been
..."
-----
-----from trI'Qal's introduction ------ lIH'eghtaHvIS trI'Qal
HoD trI'Qal ([email protected])
Tue, 20 Aug 1996 20:47:27 -0700
7. Please don't try to correct another Beginner's post, even in Klingon. I ask
that for my peace of mind... if you correct them, and your corrections are
wrong, I now have to correct *both* you and them. If I have already
responded to a post, it is open season for anyone else to offer alternate
translations... but I should warn you, if you offer another suggestion, and
your grammar is incorrect... I'll correct you as well. :) It would be better if
you didn't try to correct other beginners as a general rule, though.
-----
rut choHlaw' trI'Qal chutmey 'ach BG Daqangmo' vIlajqang.
---
Qov (Robyn Stewart) [email protected] tlhIngan Hol ngotlhchu'wI'