tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Oct 10 13:54:07 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jInajpu'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 18:17:38 -0700
>From: [email protected]
>In a message dated 96-10-07 12:13:39 EDT, ~mark writes:
><< >mu'morgh'e' Dalo'ta'bogh vIQochbe'
> "I agree with the word-protest you used"??? nuq 'oH "mu'morgh"'e' jay'?
> >>
>"word arrangement" 'oH mu' {mu'morgh}'e'
- From "may'morgh"? Maybe it means "person characterized by," from
"rejmorgh." Or maybe that's "rej" and "morgh" means "worry." I'm sorry,
but extrapolating from one word like this is very risky, especially a word
that's so ill-explained (what exactly has a battle array to do with
arrangement any more than with construction or technology?) and which has
equally occurring other meanings. The proof being in the eating: Nobody
I've heard from understood you.
>pIj mu' pImDaq mu' {morgh} lo' paq TKD
"pIj"?? "pIj"?? I see it *twice*. once in "mu'morgh" and once in
"rejmorgh" (and once in "morgh," of course.) That hardly qualifies even as
"rut," let along "pIj."
>yesh lelashon 'ivrit "chet".
"chet"?? Mah zeh "chet"? Ha'ot sheba' 'acharei "zayin"? 'o eizeh min
pesha` 'o avon? ani lo meivin bichlal.
~mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQB1AwUBMl1iYsppGeTJXWZ9AQFcMQL+O1cwFOII9NS/44bV9duXshn0zmp+NI9e
ihTXNAFey7zQhvAXbO4XDaklhQeJ/YHasJWvmmdBSgYS/F7mFMVc7Ro/TxYpPF1U
fYUMilfGmdPiozSlJ2tZZMR9lFNvc4RM
=6QI1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----