tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Oct 09 18:12:03 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jInajpu'
In a message dated 96-10-07 12:13:39 EDT, ~mark writes:
<< >mu'morgh'e' Dalo'ta'bogh vIQochbe'
"I agree with the word-protest you used"??? nuq 'oH "mu'morgh"'e' jay'?
>>
"word arrangement" 'oH mu' {mu'morgh}'e'
pIj mu' pImDaq mu' {morgh} lo' paq TKD
mu'meyvetlh wa' 'ay' vIlelta' 'ej vIlo'choHta'
HolQeDghomvamDaq mu' 'ay'mey bolelbe' 'ach wanI'vam vIpojtaH 'ej DIruch 'e'
chaw' tlhIngan Hol 'e' vIHar
latlh mu'mey chu' 'e' vIchup
roHmey = vestiges, traces, footprints (n)
cho' = next, subsequent (sv)
Daj = experiment (v)
chIj = drive (a car, e.g.) (v)
jep = be halfway through, be at the midpoint (v)
juptuy = friendship (n)
QeDmey = curricula [qunQeD, mI'QeD, chutQeD, wIchQeD, etc.] (n)
Dogh = extraneous, not of intrinsic use (sv)
veH = partition, wall; veHHom = fence (n)
-vI' = decimal-type accumulator factor (suffix)
luQ = straight (sv)
peH = includes (v)
ruS = bond, bonding (n)
peHruS
Alright, except for {chIj} = "drive" (v), these words are extractions and
rearrangements thereafter. Not one of them has canon base, yet. My
challenge is: in 1878 the Hebrew language began its resuscitation; its
dictionary was a thick pamphlet; look at the size of a Hebrew dictionary now.
Will tlhIngan Hol grow?
While I tacitly agree that only Marc Okrand has the right to coin new words,
I would like to see KLI, for example, analyzing the language in the manner I
have done above and "suggesting". We could then get the final word from MO
as to how close we have come to the bullseye. (NOTE: yesh lelashon 'ivrit
"chet".)
taHjaj tlhIngan wo' 'ej Sachjaj tlhIngan Hol