tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 24 10:56:30 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Appropriateness (was Re: RotterdamDaq qep'a)
- From: "Ben Warren" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Appropriateness (was Re: RotterdamDaq qep'a)
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 10:56:15 -0700
While some of the veteran members of this list can sometimes be brisk when
dealing with non-tlhIngan-Hol posts, I must say that I agree with their
view.
This list was created specifically for the discussion of the Klingon
language. Although most of us here are Star Trek fans, there are those
whose interest lies only with the Hol, and not the Star Trek universe. We
must respect that and act accordingly.
There are several news groups that focus on the Star Trek side of Klingon
interests. Posts not dealing with tlhIngan-Hol would be best sent there.
alt.startrek.klingon alt.shared-reality.startrek.klingon
When I first joined this list, full of enthusiasm, I posted several
non-Hol items. I was soundly reminded of the purpose of this list. While I
still at time post marginally Hol related items, I always look it over to
be sure.
Speaking of Hol (and to justify this post), I have a simple Hol question:
Could "jI (I) + Har (believe) + be' (not) = yIHarbe' (I do not believe)"?
Qapla'