tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 24 12:34:51 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Appropriateness (was Re: RotterdamDaq qep'a)



kaylar writes:

> I do not think this page should be restricted to dry grammar and the
> abilities of those who have been learning the language for five years to
> impress those who just began.

Nor is it.  As has been posted repeatedly, the list is for discussion about the 
language or anything *in* the language.

What is not acceptable, by definition, is more generic fan talk/questions in any
language that is not Klingon.

Beginners to the language (and this list) have a hard enough time wading through
the complicated posts without having to further spend time looking at irrelevant
(with respect to the language) posts.

You don't have to like it, you don't even have to agree, but if you want to play
on this list those are the rules of the place.  There are already adequate 
venues for other nonlinguistic Klingon/Star Trek discussions, so there really 
isn't even as *need* to bring them here.

Lawrence

Golly, Seqram and I are actually agreeing on something!



::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: Dr Lawrence M Schoen, Director   :: The KLI is a nonprofit ::
:: The Klingon Language Institute   :: tax exempt corporation ::
:: POB 634, Flourtown, PA 19031 USA :: DaH HuchlIj'e' ghonob  ::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::  [email protected]  :: http://www.kli.org ::  215/836-4955  ::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::



Back to archive top level