tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Aug 30 17:12:42 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC - handle: <'uchmeHwI' > or <'uchmeHghach> ????

• From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC - handle: <'uchmeHwI' > or <'uchmeHghach> ????
• Date: Fri, 30 Aug 96 19:13:57 CDT
• In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 30 Aug 1996 16:54:17 -0700

>Since when is the suffix {-wI'} Type 9? Doesn't say anything like that in my
>TKD! Look at 3.2.2.
>
>beHwI"av

Look at the "Klingon Affixes" summary list, section 3 ("Verb suffixes") on 
pg. 164 (TKD, 2nd ed.). 

Voragh

• Prev by Date: Re: translation of "nonbeliever"
• Next by Date: Re: translation of "nonbeliever"
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC - handle: <'uchmeHwI' > or <'uchmeHghach> ????
• Next by thread: RE: KLBC - handle: <'uchmeHwI' > or <'uchmeHghach> ????
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level