tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Aug 30 16:49:07 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC - handle: <'uchmeHwI' > or <'uchmeHghach> ????
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: KLBC - handle: <'uchmeHwI' > or <'uchmeHghach> ????
- Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 01:38:39 +0200
At 01:38 AM 30/8/96 -0700, you wrote:
> Chet Braun <[email protected]> wrote;-
> {'uchmeHwI} and {'uchmeHghach} each have two class 9 verb suffixes, which is
>illegal. If they mean anything, they mean "thing for the purpose of being a
>holder" and "the condition of being for the purpose of holding". Best put on
>the list for Okrand that we need a word for "handle".
Since when is the suffix {-wI'} Type 9? Doesn't say anything like that in my
TKD! Look at 3.2.2.
Qapla'
beHwI"av