tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 26 12:40:55 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: cause to be



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>Date: Sat, 24 Aug 1996 03:53:41 -0700
>From: "A.Appleyard" <[email protected]>

>  {X jIH} = I am an X. Here jIH acts as a verb. So, is this allowed? :-
>  X jIHmoH Y = the Y caused me to be an X, the Y turned me into a X.
>  Duj HoD jIHmoD matlh = Maltz appointed me as spaceship captain.

Possibly, since we're told pronouns can take verb-suffixes, but to me,
subjectively, it sounds bad.  When too much is made of that rule, it
somehow sounds wrong.  That's just my opinion of course.  But in this case,
there's a perfectly good verb already there: "moj."  Duj HoDvaD mumojmoH
matlh is probably okay, but maybe better is matlhmo' Duj HoD jImoj (or
even Duj HoD jIH).

~mark

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQB1AwUBMiH9ucppGeTJXWZ9AQHH9QL+I4+5z5WvNh/ElI9j7mw9K+KRYfAlWJc0
rr5Tfn3dQHN0i4csIZoSvn1Gwj4uDg+G2yxx0fH80r/E7cQH9XcQUXIdjVsAC9SA
bJmuwx3eg700eZDYqOAeCSjDgOWdY4yq
=a0+M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Back to archive top level