tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 17 17:15:24 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: }} A Q law' B Q puS
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: }} A Q law' B Q puS
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 1995 17:15:24 -0400 (EDT)
According to Mark E. Shoulson:
>
...
> "The purpose clause always precedes the -=>*NOUN*<=- or verb whose
> purpose it is decribing." (slight emphasis added).
>
> So it looks like Okrand intends to permit "-meH" to describe nouns.
qechlIj DatobmeH mu'tlheghvam vIlaj.
QaQ qechlIj DatobmeH mu'tlheghvetlh.
One presumes that given the canon example without any
explanation on useage, the {-meH} clause would preceed the noun
it modifies.
chutvammo' vay' mISmoHlaH mutlheghmey 'ej chutvam vIpar, 'ach vIlaj.
> ~mark
charghwI'
--
\___
o_/ \
<\__,\
"> | Get a grip.
` |