tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jan 16 19:20:25 2012
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH wa': <jeymey>
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Qov <[email protected]> wrote:
> qaD 'oHbe'pu' 'e' Sovchu' ghutar.
> batlh vangmeH HoD tojta' ghutar.[85]
jaS ghu' vIyajnISchoH.
> *Dugh* muvDI'
> ghutar, QIpmo' ghu'mey yajbe' 'e' Har vajar. 'ach 'ong DaH 'e' tlhoj.
jaS ghaH vIchovpu'. QIpbe'. Qup 'ej jIv neH 'e' vIQub.
> jatlh “jonwI' choQ Danaw'ta''a', HoD? Hung yaHDaq jeylIj vIleghpu' 'ej not
> 'el SuchwI' chaw'lIj. pa' DapawDI' Da'el net tuch.”
chaw' Hevpa' HoD qaS qar'a'?
> jatlh ghutar, “*Dugh* HungpIn jIHmo' Hung pat chu' vIleghDI' vInuD vIneH.
> patrajmo' Hem 'avwI'pu' tlhIbHa'."
patchajmo' Hem, qar'a'?
> "muQIj. HoDwI' vIQannISmo' ghochmeylIj vIlegh net tuchbe'.”
>
> jatlh Hota'ro', “pa' bISaH 'e' yIpegh. pa' ghoS SuchwI' net tuch.” toH,
> vIt'a'? toj'a'? ghuHmoHpu'mo' qImyal yep vajar.
tachDaq qaH'eng ghomchugh, ghaytan 'ollaH.
> “qatlh maQaynIS?” jatlh ghutar.
tum'a' chut 'oH. Similar to the one forbidding an aspect suffix on a
verb with {'e'} as its object, perhaps.
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol