tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 03 07:42:00 2012
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] On the word {tlho'} and its kin
- From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] On the word {tlho'} and its kin
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 07:41:44 -0800 (PST)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1325605304; bh=VFmtyMYzI4ysw6vrCOMLbLxGZI9EW+ubUfudoRC97PY=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uCd5+P4SIDox0mcrd+DRF2SbzvPOj9+2Ujg1n4w87h2uqRHI2f+L0g0ET26llJeRgjT/REOAva7zz3TO2jJIjsEeYqLsOngiAgfcElkhjuZQV1AkTsH35dNwXEVG27s+ZD/4pVW797Qn7jx2cseOkKZHoGtlw9hAMkUeSXkjPLo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VPMARJ0UUDYUq/xXHfp4k3KDEl7we0JwpKMVEDDUWWyuf3DfCQ1ctTHfY04elgcqXgNGEgs5DYu/uH5Iay/hKudeInQ6I22YQel9YX/rTYcAT0JM8Sd8vvVeNw4QUIZ/JD9Z/Gkbz5KLSTEU4udTAn+USVOsRVlXAWsiW/+ZAog=;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
- List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
- List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
Looking at this discussion of {tlho'} and thinking about the discussion a while back about the meaning of verbs unmarked vs marked with {-ta'/-pu'} and {-taH}, it occurs to me that if we work hard enough, we could probably make this language totally unusable!
-- ter'eS
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
![[KLI Member]](/pics/KLImemberbutton.gif "[KLI Member]"){kind=small}