tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 17 11:35:34 2011

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: chomuSHa''a'? ghorgh chomuS!? - Question about muSHa'

David Trimboli ([email protected])

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: chomuSHa''a'? ghorgh chomuS!? - Question about muSHa'
• Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:33:06 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Thread-index: AQG3tZxbR9zoYzUxG5DuE3jq2WrQaQIs55nelNlm/lA=

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Robyn Stewart
> There's no linguistic process I know of that could turn parHa'qu' to
parmaq, but that could be Okrand making fun, H and m being about as far
apart as 
> sounds can get.

Nah, that's Okrand back-fitting the word "parmok" introduced in a Deep Space
Nine episode by writers who never read The Klingon Dictionary.

-- 
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/


 

• References:
  • Re: chomuSHa''a'? ghorgh chomuS!? - Question about muSHa'
    • From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: chomuSHa''a'? ghorgh chomuS!? - Question about muSHa'
• Next by Date: Re: chomuSHa''a'? ghorgh chomuS!? - Question about muSHa'
• Previous by thread: Re: chomuSHa''a'? ghorgh chomuS!? - Question about muSHa'
• Next by thread: RE: chomuSHa''a'? ghorgh chomuS!? - Question about muSHa'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level