tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 02 17:31:01 2011
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: targh wambogh tlhIngan
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Robyn Stewart <[email protected]> wrote:
> jIbDaj tIq ghermeH choljaH lo'
I've only seen {gher} used referring to things like information, often
in specific contrast with {qon}.
> vengHom juH juStaHvIS, vagh' loD legh.
typo: {vagh}
> chIch qoreQ luleghbe' loDpu'
{chIch leghbe'} is an odd phrase to my ears, but I won't say it's a bad one.
> ngem Ha'DIbaHmey ghoch qoreQ qupqu'taHvIS.
{Qupqu'taHvIS}
> qam 'ej largh.
{Qam}
> lam tun Sujlaw'pu' targh namwechDu'.
{luSujlaw'pu'}, unless you want to imply plural dirt.
> HuDHom ghIrpu' targh. HuDHomvetlh ghIr qoreQ.
(I never considered {ghIr} to be transitive. I can't explain why.)
> qamqu' QoreQ.
{Qamqu'}
> DeSDajDaq SoQchoH targh nuj
It might be clearer to say {QoreQ DeSDaq}.
> ngemvaD jatlh qoreQ, <i>DaHjaj targh vIHoHta'.</i>
maj. vaQ mu'meylIj. reH yabwIjDaq cha'chu'.
I am still impressed at how expressive Klingon can be when it is
wielded properly.
-- ghunchu'wI'