tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 30 08:14:08 2010

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: choH vs. choHmoH

Seruq ([email protected])

• From: "Seruq" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: choH vs. choHmoH
• Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:11:26 -0600
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Thread-index: AcqhipYkDswgj4pvTHCF8wZAT8DAnwAO7hgw

Didn't MO tell us that choH could go both ways, like meQ?
(Am I correctly remembering that he told us meQ goes both ways, or am I confusing my multiple
timeline memories again?)


DloraH

• References:
  • Re: choH vs. choHmoH
    • From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Cataphoric pronouns
• Next by Date: Re: choH vs. choHmoH
• Previous by thread: KLBC: tlhIngan qeq
• Next by thread: Re: choH vs. choHmoH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level