tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 12 16:12:21 2010

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?

Michael Everson ([email protected])

From: Michael Everson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:11:06 +0000
In-reply-to: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A60113A1A56606@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A60113A1A56605@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu> <[email protected]> <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A60113A1A56606@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>

On 12 Jan 2010, at 21:32, Steven Boozer wrote:

> This should of course be:  {majQa'! vIparHa'qu'!!} ("Well done! I  
> like it a lot!!")

Or, in a nice casing orthography, "Majxa'! Viparha'qu'!!"

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
  - From: Steven Lytle <[email protected]>
- Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
  - From: Alex Greene <[email protected]>
- RE: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
  - From: Michael Everson <[email protected]>
- RE: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
Next by Date: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
Previous by thread: RE: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
Next by thread: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
Index(es):