tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 30 14:59:07 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: na'ran rur [Re: Klingon WOTD: na' (verb)]
qurgh lungqIj wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:26 PM, David Trimboli <[email protected]> wrote:
>> na'ran rurbogh Soj luSop tera'ngan 'e' lutIv.
>>
> Should there be an -'e' on Soj to mark is as the head noun of the -bogh
> clause or is that optional?
>
> na'ran rurbogh Soj'e' luSop tera'ngan 'e' lutIv.
It's optional. Given that {na'ran rur} is a recognized clause with a
specific meaning, there isn't really any confusion as to what the
sentence means.
--
SuStel
tlhIngan Hol MUSH
http://trimboli.name/mush