tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 30 14:59:07 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: na'ran rur [Re: Klingon WOTD: na' (verb)]

David Trimboli ( [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']

qurgh lungqIj wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:26 PM, David Trimboli <> wrote:
>> na'ran rurbogh Soj luSop tera'ngan 'e' lutIv.
> Should there be an -'e' on Soj to mark is as the head noun of the -bogh
> clause or is that optional?
> na'ran rurbogh Soj'e' luSop tera'ngan 'e' lutIv.

It's optional. Given that {na'ran rur} is a recognized clause with a 
specific meaning, there isn't really any confusion as to what the 
sentence means.

tlhIngan Hol MUSH

Back to archive top level