tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 18 11:50:55 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Relative clause in a relative clause

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Relative clause in a relative clause
• Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:49:17 EDT

In a message dated 9/18/2009 13:49:15 Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> HoHbogh tlhIngan luja'chuq. HoHbogh tlhIngan vISov
> They discuses the Klingon that died. I know the Klingon that died.
> 
> qurgh
> 

Can {ja'chuq} take an object?  I thought not, since {-chuq} implies the 
object and subject are the same (each other, actually).

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Relative clause in a relative clause
    • From: Andrà MÃller <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Relative clause in a relative clause
• Next by Date: Re: Relative clause in a relative clause
• Previous by thread: Re: Relative clause in a relative clause
• Next by thread: Re: Relative clause in a relative clause
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level