tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 18 11:50:55 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Relative clause in a relative clause

MorphemeAddict (MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com) [KLI Member] [Hol taghwI']



In a message dated 9/18/2009 13:49:15 Eastern Daylight Time, 
qurgh@wizage.net writes:

> HoHbogh tlhIngan luja'chuq. HoHbogh tlhIngan vISov
> They discuses the Klingon that died. I know the Klingon that died.
> 
> qurgh
> 

Can {ja'chuq} take an object?  I thought not, since {-chuq} implies the 
object and subject are the same (each other, actually).

lay'tel SIvten






Back to archive top level