tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Oct 28 17:51:38 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: intuition and grammar (was Re: Ditransitive reflexives)
Steven Lytle (email@example.com)
- From: Steven Lytle <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: intuition and grammar (was Re: Ditransitive reflexives)
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:49:22 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=c/AXEDjMOrsVjzXk8GF6cQ92I1WFhTxjXj9IQ4SXveo=; b=m+/YP2IL2b6Yq+WWcAREAMd1HW4vXXd4J1ZWaTCcN19QaI33pGV5n+3KF/1wlqnXiw ojcLSiGQPDox7/yw2iLP2AE7C+9nxlM2Pz0gCLnmERlckRypnNq+Xa79y2bbRre/e6nv F1v9TurCPo1qED2kNJhOqlbMGWGJxxelTo7mc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=muEOdSfyYcGk4khwtNwdN6lMj7jzmlQGvu1nKBHj0pv/bXeCMZPI1bwO3Lg3/Nu7Yw DkZDG2f+iWHxpdZw7IU2Q7AsWpXMvvaeltnqv0NXK8NPvqBI03pLFmXgS2KkFXFlaHAY IRZJcV9B9qHf+9I6vZ0IZb/nB3t01aTtM4vd8=
- In-reply-to: <3FD7DBAC-D0DE-4085-93F9-DF3182F7F788@alcaco.net>
- References: <4AE73DCD.email@example.com> <BLU144-W13ED69BDB8BCD3FAB35738A7B80@phx.gbl> <3FD7DBAC-D0DE-4085-93F9-DF3182F7F788@alcaco.net>
It's safer to walk around a hole than to jump in. We don't know how deep the
holes are, and they're difficult to illuminate.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:56 AM, ghunchu'wI' <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2009, at 3:48 AM, eric mead wrote:
> > And that actually brings me to my larger question. What happens in
> > the culture of tlhIngan Hol if there is found an area of the
> > grammar that seems problematic and/or just missing and the fluent
> > speakers have an intuition (generally agreed upon) about it?? Does
> > that become another resource? Or are speakers not 'allowed' to add
> > their own intuitions to the grammar?
> Speakers can use whatever intuition or pet theories or personal
> preferences they want. However, nobody here has the authority to add
> anything to the grammar. If what someone says makes sense, others
> are free to adopt its use as well. If it isn't in conflict with the
> officially published rules of the language, it might even become
> widely popular. Even so, there will usually be some who are more
> conservative and resist trendy things until and unless they are
> sanctioned by Marc Okrand.
> The basic goal is for someone to be able to learn Klingon well using
> only the published books as a resource. Where there's a hole in the
> grammar (e.g. subjunctive), the basic advice is to avoid it, not to
> fill it.
> -- ghunchu'wI'