tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Nov 27 17:59:53 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Checking understanding of -be'

David Trimboli ( [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']

Seruq wrote:

>> There is no indication anywhere that {-lu'be'} means "not anyone at
>> all" or "no one." There is a word for "no one": {pagh}.
> In that case we also have a word for "someone".

True, and Okrand has used it as a way to get around the conflict between 
{-lu'} and {-laH}: qeylIS lIjlaHbe'bogh vay' "Kahless the Unforgettable."

tlhIngan Hol MUSH

Back to archive top level