tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Nov 27 08:25:42 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: {-lu'} on intransitive verbs [WAS Re: The topic marker -'e']
- From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: {-lu'} on intransitive verbs [WAS Re: The topic marker -'e']
- Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:24:32 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jDv90Au7eltdmizf4nvdR3JD4y6xBNdDNtOxjrMEHHI=; b=vneyihaEkqScRTicvBCwmdzzIuYw6Ay8jIUWA/McuLysme7J9TBXaZl+TLo9CvCFbs +ohNTV6CL9TduI4vUIZpC84QMR4F0rLcc2Kb0Cteo1fevVLYa13MAIR4BMTck9fd/L3K ZYuM4a0P3wMTTQg+vzBDxIxaGlkKidPJenU3Q=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=P0/yRHkpJo9qj/QhA15TZs7AFLOjsMUMk6Mn9eByONuoWhhO9aD/DHMpQoOL2c4d5H LJgE8E+MxP7iSkyyiLRyCvcDXMngW98UYoQi4jRWVsbssL2wzkqmvzTyBzpqHNecs88m 3SNxE9mGwYZjYF6njnbeOlkhvJxoeZfooLTe8=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 08:17, ghunchu'wI' <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There indeed is something like nominalization going on here, but it's
> the {'e'} that does it. It serves its normal purpose of standing in
> for the action of the first sentence, as the object of the second
> sentence.
No, it's not.