tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Nov 17 09:57:58 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Locatives
- From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Locatives
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:56:01 -0800 (PST)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1258480561; bh=+xjj20WPIMM05JDyJrdMigJycxlK/kJbh6APJ1FRGmE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FLbT0Z2E/KAbgRleazsq/kSC53jBOSo/6I2G8/GNAXO1m2qcjXZ+/INfsAN9Bh2/Qc67fSP5oX8YqRc51zYIsOAkh5K2ul/n+NHKPuyHqmQWUHzqGxfr4lrYb49poWT20IpGTSsZSlnMZ1vT+SuKgRtdfXn4xDisNRcOnw2+sis=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AeT4E0fzJqHOS//CMkzQm2KmdvSZKBD7FJixmAiXJr7IOY7yPj92lBnKjAc33n+m3JdeuYSBingr1bvry6dOdFs9Jq8OtkwOwz9vzFgPgLRSBj1R2+FCsdxe0LoOL8mWSyfGung0FbZSLy+v899A/kkrcbSfChhZN6R6JhNB3og=;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Voragh will be here soon with examples, but briefly...
--- On Tue, 11/17/09, Tracy Canfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are there any limits on which nouns
> may take the -Daq ending?
>
> (1) Can it be used with nouns referring to
> people? Some languages
> with locative constructions use them with nouns for people,
> with
> meanings along the lines of "where so-and-so is" or "at
> so-and-so's
> house." Does Klingon allow this?
I've never seen this usage in Klingon.
>
> (1a) And if it does, can -Daq be used with
> pronouns? We know that
> -'e', another Type 5 suffix, can attach to pronouns - do we
> know about
> -Daq?
>
I don't see why not, eg. {jIHDaq Sum Duj}. 'The ship is close to me.'
> (1b) Similarly, TKD 3.4 gives us nagh DungDaq "above
> the rock",
> formed using the noun-noun construction "nagh Dung" plus
> -Daq. We
> also know that pronouns can't be used in possessive
> constructions, and
> the possessive suffixes are used instead (TKD 5.1).
>
> So would "above me" be DungwI'Daq?
No, these are a special case. In these cases, you use the independent pronoun in an N-N construction: {jIH DungDaq}. I think this is the only time you can use an independent pronoun to show possession.
>
> (2) Can -Daq be used with abstract nouns? It
> doesn't seem to have a
> metaphorical sense that locative constructions in other
> languages have
> - I think every example I've seen with it refers to a
> location in
> space.
>
I believe both {-Daq} and {-vo'} refer strictly to location (you couldn't use them, for example, to say that a work was translated from English into Klingon).
-- ter'eS