tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 28 07:47:13 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: nuq bach?

Steven Boozer ([email protected])

• From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: nuq bach?
• Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:45:22 -0500
• Accept-language: en-US
• Acceptlanguage: en-US
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Thread-index: AcnfkNcYSThl6t37QqmM/64gkOVnmwAER/pQ
• Thread-topic: nuq bach?

Rohan F wrote:
>> the indirect object of {bach} should also probably be marked with 
>> {-Daq}, and that's what turns up on S14:
>>
>>   ...ray' HopDaq bachlu'meH chuqna' ghurmoH naQvam
>>   "This [stock] serves to ... increase the effective range 
>>   for distance targeting." (S14)

SuStel:
>Pretty conclusive right there!

It also turns up in one of the Klingon lines from an earlier draft of the ST5 script missing from the final cut, which Okrand published in HolQeD 8.4:12-13:

  logh veQDaq bachchugh, yoH 'e' toblaHbe' SuvwI' 
  Shooting space garbage is no test of a warrior's mettle.
  (ST5 notes)

 
--
Voragh                          
Canon Master of the Klingons

• References:
  • Re: nuq bach?
    • From: Rohan F <[email protected]>
  • Re: nuq bach?
    • From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: nuq bach?
• Next by Date: RE: qolqoS?
• Previous by thread: Re: nuq bach?
• Next by thread: Re: nuq bach?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level