tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 28 05:35:23 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: nuq bach?

David Trimboli (david@trimboli.name) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']



Rohan F wrote:

> the indirect object of {bach} should also probably be marked with {-Daq},
> and that's what turns up on S14:
> 
> ...ray' HopDaq bachlu'meH chuqna' ghurmoH naQvam
> "This [stock] serves to ... increase the effective range for distance
> targeting." (S14)

Pretty conclusive right there!

-- 
David Trimboli
http://www.trimboli.name/






Back to archive top level