tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 21 20:47:18 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: reH ru'Ha' pagh. chut 'oH
- From: Brent Kesler <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: reH ru'Ha' pagh. chut 'oH
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:45:32 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MrtWbgBypV9Y2qGRY4yvCVsZGqrKGJ7TlWfn7KyXyxc=; b=qtX22X16V88n3go9xHnnq3WntFEIIDfJPTO0uDfm/Gs+iyJBHLOGJFfHCDD9GEpImC 0Dk5FgC2z5hrZ41zQ3LEoxY3zHGojoq17tN/5uza1mC9GZkaPmfvWjQyXQlnsHZul4Oy SIFHvyz89OzkCRSCciNxkGAkZf70gnkYuAnAg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=L0cnJj6R8Ii0p/YTqpqXFD4SpS8czLo1S50qr6dxgv30gdjd3fBW0agpCGTpSJhKKx r9rJCYzIIGVtqunZAi4yd4xtseef6SigV2yugq9512jgaI93+klrZRlX+AvUe6JGUpWi 2XsE/tzU0t4R49IW4XzTW+0UIzpmviXbs2NQY=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Terrence Donnelly
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Pretty good, at first glance.
[...]
> Also, {vaj} implies a consequence, but here I think you just want the sequence of time, or {ghIq}.
Thanks. I've been making that mistake a lot lately.
reH ru'Ha' pagh. chut 'oH
HeghnIS yIn, yInnIS Hegh
rInDI' yIn, rInDI' Hegh
ghIq paghmo' belqu' Hoch
> I don't understand {-DI'} working the way you've done here. I always took it to mean "as soon as", while I think you want it to say "after", for which I'd use {-ta'DI'}.
I think {-DI'} includes {-ta'DI'} in this case. {-ta'DI'} is a little
more emphatic about when, but I think both are accurate. And I wanted
each line to be six syllables {{{;-)
bI'reng