tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun May 17 12:27:44 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: recent boing boing post and Unicode

Doq (doq@embarqmail.com)



I highly recommend human editing, regardless of the automation used.  
Nothing is foolproof. Fools can be so inventive.

Doq

On May 17, 2009, at 10:08 AM, ghunchu'wI' wrote:

> On May 16, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Terrence Donnelly wrote:
>
>> Writing an algorithm to convert romanized Hol to a pIqaD-friendly
>> format is relatively trivial.
>
> If you can assume the source document is well-formed, and that it
> contains Klingon letters only, then it's easy.  It's not much harder
> to include a check for unreasonable alphabetic characters (e.g.
> "k").  But what do you do with punctuation?  Commas and periods have
> a traditional mapping to up- and down-pointing triangles, but that's
> it.  Do you map question marks to periods and rely on grammar to
> convey the difference?  Do you count semicolons and dashes as comma-
> like pauses as well?  What do you do with quotations?
>
> Mixed-language source introduces an entirely different set of
> challenges, with the question of how to resolve them being somewhat
> more philosophical than technical.  /QQ/QQ0407.html?
> mode=XIFAN shows one possibility, though there are still glitches.
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
>
>
>







Back to archive top level