tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jun 27 15:33:55 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Klingon translation

Doq (doq@embarqmail.com)



qay'be'.

On Jun 27, 2009, at 6:29 PM, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote:

> In a message dated 6/27/2009 18:19:55 Eastern Daylight Time,
> doq@embarqmail.com writes:
>
>> While I like using the suffix {-'e'} to mark the head noun that links
>> the relative clause and the main clause, Okrand has rarely used it,
>> and in this particular case, since there is only one noun in the
>> relative clause, it doesn't really need to be marked.
>>
>> What you've written is definitely not wrong. It's just putting an
>> unusual quantity of focus on {nuHvetlh}.
>>
>> Doq
>>
>
> Good point.  Like I said, I should have just read the whole post  
> before
> jumping in.
>
> lay'tel SIvten
>
>
>







Back to archive top level