tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jun 27 15:30:47 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon translation

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Klingon translation
• Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:29:26 EDT

In a message dated 6/27/2009 18:19:55 Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> While I like using the suffix {-'e'} to mark the head noun that links  
> the relative clause and the main clause, Okrand has rarely used it,  
> and in this particular case, since there is only one noun in the  
> relative clause, it doesn't really need to be marked.
> 
> What you've written is definitely not wrong. It's just putting an  
> unusual quantity of focus on {nuHvetlh}.
> 
> Doq
> 

Good point.  Like I said, I should have just read the whole post before 
jumping in.

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Klingon translation
    • From: Doq <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon translation
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon translation
• Previous by thread: Re: Klingon translation
• Next by thread: Re: Klingon translation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level