tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jun 27 15:30:47 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Klingon translation

MorphemeAddict (MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com) [KLI Member] [Hol taghwI']



In a message dated 6/27/2009 18:19:55 Eastern Daylight Time, 
doq@embarqmail.com writes:

> While I like using the suffix {-'e'} to mark the head noun that links  
> the relative clause and the main clause, Okrand has rarely used it,  
> and in this particular case, since there is only one noun in the  
> relative clause, it doesn't really need to be marked.
> 
> What you've written is definitely not wrong. It's just putting an  
> unusual quantity of focus on {nuHvetlh}.
> 
> Doq
> 

Good point.  Like I said, I should have just read the whole post before 
jumping in.

lay'tel SIvten






Back to archive top level