tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jul 29 11:18:35 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: {vIl} (was Re: News from Maltz)
- From: "Michael Roney, Jr." <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: {vIl} (was Re: News from Maltz)
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:17:38 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :reply-to:subject:in-reply-to:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=Mm41OocOqaMGT1mqg4nSXFeESrSc6cuc5xl6kRL/TJ8=; b=IeNVpgph/MAX/p5dYwUG+OThMeV+0a0NtEpJZB6yp9w25JY4rzSEjmPBVifDQxUJ3L ZdI5me4FRLNG55InLu4xphyq3M8WCb+phkWuXSOYRhA6PXdeZ/8zR5U4wMEFJ7qIzkra ZH9ApKrS+eAOjqk0eWsD1gyKSefdfp89T2U18=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:reply-to:subject:in-reply-to:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=JpD5YxyJ/Ef+8jZYraitZODRLfcPAJwxuB5qtRLyzz/EkOt7o4KHMF+EDbxX46+rds U4UiNtWOnpL1OEsPq8E+951aXvWMQANfVZHw6F4uYWSAok9gsMEgtXeNuJ0eNQyBwQm/ yVJ/WHXNXSrwcecSginVfcJajm2UvQnsmZL0w=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Hahaha. I was thinking the same thing.
Beat me to it.
~naHQun
-Michael Roney, Jr.
Professional Klingon translator
http://twitter.com/roneyii
--Sent from my Palm PrÄ?Krenath wrote:
Heh. Since I'm currently on Twitter a lot, it reminds me a lot of the
way I think of Twitter followers.
Some of them are vIlle'pu'. People you know and like and follow you
because they like you.
And some are vIlpu'. They just show up in your followers list and you
have no idea what the heck prompted them to follow you.
On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:44 PM, "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:48 AM, David Trimboli<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Oh! It's the thing your aunt gave you which you don't know what it
>> is.
>>
>> So {vIl} means "someone or something one can always find around."
>
> I think that puts a little too much emphasis on the reliability of the
> thing or person. {vIl} strikes me more as referring to someone or
> something you keep noticing, rather than something or someone you
> would intentionally look for. When I asked Marc Okrand whether
> "sidekick" would be an appropriate term, he said no, and gave this
> example: "It would apply to this woman I know who seems to show up (as
> an audience member or an usher or something) at every play I go to. I
> don't know why she's always there, but it's weird."
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
>
>
>