tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 28 08:19:47 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: News from Maltz
- From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: News from Maltz
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:18:11 -0500
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
- Thread-index: AcoPj0I3gyijxFTHRWaVrCZBWbcEWgABEANA
- Thread-topic: News from Maltz
ghunchu'wI':
>> 1) The noun {vIlle'} means something close to "minion". [The word
>> in English is often used to refer to a loyal or even fawning
>> servant of someone who is typically considered powerful. Compare
>> with "henchman", who has the same general job but is usually a
>> mercenary.]
Quvar:
>>> Maybe not intended, but when you read {vIlle'} backwards, it sounds
>>> like "élève", french for "student". Not only one being taught in
>>> school, but also like a minion. (maybe just a coincidence?)
SuStel:
>>>> My guess is that it sounds like "villain," which is the
>>>> sort of person who nearly always has minions.
ter'eS:
>Also, wasn't there an old English word "villein" that meant something
>like servant or minion?
>From the Wiktionary (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/villain ):
"Probably Middle English *villain* from Old French *villain* (modern: *villain*), in turn from Late Latin *villanus*, meaning serf or peasant, someone who is bound to the soil of a villa, which is to say, worked on the equivalent of a plantation in late Antiquity, in Italy or Gaul."
ghunchu'wI':
>> 2) The noun {vIl} is hard to define. Maltz had given a description
>> of something which was immediately recognized as a speed bump by
>> everyone present, but it was apparently intended not as an actual
>> definition but as an example of something which is "just there".
>> There is obviously an etymological relationship with and {vIlle'},
>> which is currently the best clue we have to its true meaning.
>>
>> Consider someone who keeps showing up when you go places. This
>> person doesn't necessarily have any particular importance to what
>> you're doing, and it wouldn't matter to you at all if he or she
>> weren't present, but the person is "just there". That would be
>> a {vIl}.
E.g. an "extra" in the movies, television, etc.? They're "just there" in the background, without any lines. Perhaps in Trek terms, a "red shirt" -- those extras who always get killed by the villain-of-the-week in TOS.
>> It also can describe someone who hangs around, ready to help out,
>> whether or not you need anyone to help you. Again, it wouldn't
>> make any difference to you if the person weren't there.
E.g. a "gofer"?
qurgh:
>It was also suggested that vIlHom could be a single ridge in a Quch.
ATTN qurgh: Was this suggested by Okrand?
Cf. {vIl} "be ridgy (forehead)" [HQ 13.1:10].
Aha! Everybody has a (bumpy) forehead, it's something that's "just there". It only became an issue when Klingons began encountering those queer smooth-foreheaded aliens. (And the less said about those unfortunate diseased, smooth-headed "Fusion" Klingons, the better!
--
Voragh
Canon Master of the Klingons