tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 12 14:21:57 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: vIl - be ridgy in HolQeD 13:1

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: vIl - be ridgy in HolQeD 13:1
• Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:20:14 EDT

In a message dated 7/12/2009 15:01:07 Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> Yes, it would be odd for Humans to talk about smooth foreheads amongst 
> themselves. It's a forehead.
> Klingons may or may not have spoken about forehead quality back in the 
> time of Kahless, but once they met non-Klingons, and *especially* after a 
> large number of them "lost" their foreheads, the topic most certainly would 
> have come up.
> 
> 
> On the other hand, Ferengi talk about lobe size a lot. So maybe Klingons 
> have always talked about their foreheads.
> 

There is a lot of variation in Klingon forehead ridginess, so it would 
probably be a topic in any case.

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: vIl - be ridgy in HolQeD 13:1
    • From: "qe'San \(Jon Brown\)" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: vIl - be ridgy in HolQeD 13:1
• Next by Date: Re: vIl - be ridgy in HolQeD 13:1
• Previous by thread: Re: {pagh Doch} or {pagh Dochmey}? (Fwd: [Question #76058]: Klingon plural expression is this: Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=n > 1)
• Next by thread: Re: vIl - be ridgy in HolQeD 13:1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level