tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 09 16:28:25 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Questions with law'/puS

Terrence Donnelly ( [KLI Member]

--- On Thu, 7/9/09, David Trimboli <> wrote:

> >> It's special. It can't be interpolated or
> expanded. It must remain
> >>  fixed. Period. Done. Game, set, and match.
> rIntaH.
> > 
> > Absence of evidence /= evidence of absence.
> I didn't claim there was any evidence.

You're claiming that since we've never seen the suffix {-'a'} (for example) used with {law'/puS}, its use is absolutely impossible, whereas all that proves is that we've never seen it.  Unless or until MO rules definitively "No", it remains a possibility.


Back to archive top level