tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 09 16:51:53 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Questions with law'/puS
Terrence Donnelly wrote:
> --- On Thu, 7/9/09, David Trimboli <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>> It's special. It can't be interpolated or
>> expanded. It must remain
>>>> fixed. Period. Done. Game, set, and match.
>> rIntaH.
>>> Absence of evidence /= evidence of absence.
>> I didn't claim there was any evidence.
>
> You're claiming that since we've never seen the suffix {-'a'} (for
> example) used with {law'/puS}, its use is absolutely impossible,
> whereas all that proves is that we've never seen it. Unless or until
> MO rules definitively "No", it remains a possibility.
Take away the "since we've never seen" part. I am making a statement
unfounded by any evidence. It has only the force of opinion and
conservatism. I speak prescriptively, as a style guide, not
descriptively. It is not a claim, it is a directive.
I did NOT say it can't be done because we haven't seen it.
--
SuStel
tlhIngan Hol MUSH
http://trimboli.name/mush
![[KLI Member]](../../../pics/KLImemberbutton.gif "[KLI Member]"){kind=small}
![[Hol po'wI']](../../../pics/level3_big.png "[Hol po'wI']"){kind=small}