tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 09 14:52:25 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Questions with law'/puS
David Trimboli (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Terrence Donnelly wrote:
> --- On Thu, 7/9/09, David Trimboli <email@example.com> wrote:
>> It was in KGT, where Okrand is telling us about special exceptions
>> to the usual law'/puS construction. law'be'/puSbe' is a specially
>> sanctioned formation, and not evidence of a general trend of using
>> verb suffixes.
> Did he come out and say in KGT that there are no other allowable
>> It's special. It can't be interpolated or expanded. It must remain
>> fixed. Period. Done. Game, set, and match. rIntaH.
> Absence of evidence /= evidence of absence.
I didn't claim there was any evidence.
tlhIngan Hol MUSH