tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 09 14:52:25 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Questions with law'/puS

David Trimboli (david@trimboli.name) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']



Terrence Donnelly wrote:
> --- On Thu, 7/9/09, David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name> wrote:
>> It was in KGT, where Okrand is telling us about special exceptions
>> to the usual law'/puS construction. law'be'/puSbe' is a specially 
>> sanctioned formation, and not evidence of a general trend of using
>> verb suffixes.
> 
> Did he come out and say in KGT that there are no other allowable
> suffixes?

Nope.

>> It's special. It can't be interpolated or expanded. It must remain
>>  fixed. Period. Done. Game, set, and match. rIntaH.
> 
> Absence of evidence /= evidence of absence.

I didn't claim there was any evidence.

-- 
SuStel
tlhIngan Hol MUSH
http://trimboli.name/mush






Back to archive top level