tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 02 09:51:20 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Klingon Draydels
- From: Krenath <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Klingon Draydels
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:49:30 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:references; bh=2790elQDaOKQT29rKCHUUhM8PUVvXqIEZcJUMCPuzzg=; b=ii3wK2Rn2YWM0Zre3gJF/uPHWMkmtCAXSuus3IjjrTlMCmQOY76EiPuflDJWRfk9Ny L7+uYHk60BVYzLKsHRHzmYPPVv9sxl7FWV7puXgNb+gkuq1YB6SfxP/BSpNRn8/e9tn2 qXQBg3P1Qsl20cvlUO60Xxeaq9Qeb3fOkUe20=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date :references; b=gIFO2X6RmqQ/CJICdT+QduexuDTcr7TUNgt+zqOgXtAXMQVFMbip6goeDXFSvHuiYk xMvGwNziDLHez3QYrrCn5cDWVOGu/UFeouFDRt3KF8J9kUnUeole5uUKH/Io3FN4LcPy TmM0ppl/ndDMllaf9elCUJ73t0EX8nDX73Z9M=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Fortunately, in pIqaD, p, b, gh, and Q are quite distinctive.
And if we're going to this much effort, why not pIqaD? :)
On Dec 2, 2009, at 12:07 PM, "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Michael Roney, Jr.
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> So if I were to label a draydel in pIqaD, they'd still be able to
>> play.
>>
>> Now before I get started, has anyone done this yet?
>
> I've not actually made one, but many years ago I came up with this:
>
> "pa' QuDmo' bechchu' ghol} "The opponent suffered completely because
> of the insurrection there."
>
> pa' :: p :: pagh (nothing)
> QuDmo' :: Q :: Qapla' (success)
> bechchu' :: b :: bID (half)
> ghol :: gh :: ghaq (contribute)
>
> It occurs to me that {p} and {b} are just similar enough to confuse
> people the way nun and gimel sometimes do. :)
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
>
>
>