tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri May 02 13:57:17 2008

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Canonicity

Steven Boozer ([email protected])

• From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Canonicity
• Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 15:55:49 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

As an {'o'megh} to this round of the canonicity problem, I read an 
interesting anecdote on a totally unrelated news site today ...

Science fiction author Peter David recounted a discussion he had with the 
folks who were licensing the rights to use the Star Trek characters to 
Simon & Schuster (Pocket Books).  The question arose:  Which stories would 
be deemed "canonical" -- those from TV and the movies or those in the 
books?  A resolution was proposed:  What was on screen would be "what 
really happened," while what was in print would be "just make-believe."





--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons

• Prev by Date: Re: be'nalwI' naH yotlh
• Next by Date: No Impotence
• Previous by thread: Re: be'nalwI' naH yotlh
• Next by thread: No Impotence
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level